Watching a tennis match between two promising juniors, one an Australian and the other a New Zealander, earlier this 12 months, I noticed a very attention-grabbing incident.
At matchpoint down in the second set, the Australian participant clearly failed in an try to run down a drop volley from his opponent. Scooping the ball (which had clearly bounced twice) over his opponent?s head, the Australian participant continued to deal with the point as if it were still ?live?.
Meanwhile, the New Zealander, certain that the match was over, headed in the direction of the web to shake his opponent?s hand.
Except for the umpire, everybody who was there, together with the Australian player, knew that the ball had bounced twice. Despite a reputable protest and an attraction to his opponent?s honesty, the New Zealander ?misplaced? the purpose, came very near ?shedding? the set, and, I am positive, would have discovered it extremely difficult to win the match had it gone to a 3rd set.
Had that been the case, had the Australian received the match, would it have been a case of dishonesty, not honesty, being the perfect policy? In any case, when it comes to sport, isn?t it a case of successful being the whole lot, even when it includes dishonest?
And even when it isn?t a case of both dishonesty being the very best policy or of successful being every thing, how do you explain to a younger participant who has simply lost due to his opponent?s dishonesty that honesty is the most effective policy, and that winning, if it requires dishonest, (or even when it doesn?t), ISN?T everything.
Although others may disagree, it?s my competition that any try to win by the use of dishonest mechanically manufacturers the cheat because the loser ? no matter what the outcome.
Except for the truth that any sincere spectator can not help however lose all respect for a cheat, much more significantly, a cheat can not help but lose all respect for himself.
No matter how laborious he tries, he can?t escape the detrimental penalties of his dishonest actions. He can?t evade the truth that he has used deceit to gain one thing (a counterfeit win) that in any other case wouldn?t have been his.
In so doing, he should live with the self-knowledge ? as well as the data of any spectator ? that he has defaulted on the principle of honesty, and as a substitute, turn into a cheat. He can by no means really feel completely happy, within the true sense of the phrase, about his so-known as win.
Due to this fact, I would explain to any young tennis player who has just lost to a cheat, and who, as a consequence, mistakenly thinks that cheats do prosper, that nothing could possibly be farther from the truth.
And to make my level, I would then ask him if he?d like to commerce places, if just for a second, with someone who has a deserved fame as a cheat, or if he would be ok with winning by way of cheating.
Discussing sports ethics with kids is extraordinarily necessary for 2 causes:
The primary is that sport offers them with the most effective opportunities to formulate the moral rules which they will then apply in all spheres and phases of later life.
The second is that sports activities cheats give the purity of wholesome competition a nasty name, and may, due to this fact, be roundly condemned.
If you would like additional knowledge about candle supplies pay a visit to the blogger?s web site directly.
Source: http://www.articledirectorynews.com/recreation-sports/tennis-ethics-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.